Michael Donohoe

The technical, trivial and interesting things I find

September 26, 2011 at 6:11am
Home
The Washington Post Social Reader app unnerves me. The act of “Reading” is now itself an action. You don’t click any “read this” button. It may be benign to some but there are potential pitfalls on the privacy front.

What if your friends saw a steady stream of articles that you were reading?

1. Finding comedy in cancer

2. Study: Sexual potency after prostate cancer can depend on age, weight, treatment type

3. Quiz gives facts about skin cancer

4. A fight that’s only begun

and so on…

What do you think they might want to ask you about?

That is just a hastily put together example, but I think it illustrates my point.

We are what we read, and sometimes we need to explore topics and subjects that need to stay in the private realm. There are plenty of good and bad reasons why you would extensively read up on articles regarding to health, diseases, diabetes, marriage, death, suicide, taxes, depression… the list goes on.

Would you want those articles bunched together in your public feed?

The Washington Post has an Editor’s Note. Its says many things including:

“All you have to do is read, just as you normally do. No “recommending,” “liking” or “sharing” — just read and we’ll do the rest of the work. The app gets better the more friends you have using it.”

Thats a very nice spin on it.

Earlier this year when I was still at the Times we talked to Facebook about a news app. Facebook had a whole set of new features in the pipeline (presumably just launched) and this passive reading action was one of them and they were looking for us to use it. It came up in conference calls and on-site meetings. I believe Facebook is very eager to catch-up or even displace Twitter as a go-to place for news, and this is how they think they can do that.

To their credit the newsroom shelved the idea. The consensus was that this was intrusive and potentially an invasion of privacy. I think after that was repeatedly communicated that Facebook lost interest in doing anything at all.

I think its one thing to broadcast your taste in music, but what you are reading raises the stakes a bit. For now, all I have is this isolated case but everything has a beginning.

The Washington Post Social Reader app unnerves me. The act of “Reading” is now itself an action. You don’t click any “read this” button. It may be benign to some but there are potential pitfalls on the privacy front.

What if your friends saw a steady stream of articles that you were reading?

1. Finding comedy in cancer

2. Study: Sexual potency after prostate cancer can depend on age, weight, treatment type

3. Quiz gives facts about skin cancer

4. A fight that’s only begun

and so on…

What do you think they might want to ask you about?

That is just a hastily put together example, but I think it illustrates my point.

We are what we read, and sometimes we need to explore topics and subjects that need to stay in the private realm. There are plenty of good and bad reasons why you would extensively read up on articles regarding to health, diseases, diabetes, marriage, death, suicide, taxes, depression… the list goes on.

Would you want those articles bunched together in your public feed?

The Washington Post has an Editor’s Note. Its says many things including:

All you have to do is read, just as you normally do. No “recommending,” “liking” or “sharing” — just read and we’ll do the rest of the work. The app gets better the more friends you have using it.

Thats a very nice spin on it.

Earlier this year when I was still at the Times we talked to Facebook about a news app. Facebook had a whole set of new features in the pipeline (presumably just launched) and this passive reading action was one of them and they were looking for us to use it. It came up in conference calls and on-site meetings. I believe Facebook is very eager to catch-up or even displace Twitter as a go-to place for news, and this is how they think they can do that.

To their credit the newsroom shelved the idea. The consensus was that this was intrusive and potentially an invasion of privacy. I think after that was repeatedly communicated that Facebook lost interest in doing anything at all.

I think its one thing to broadcast your taste in music, but what you are reading raises the stakes a bit. For now, all I have is this isolated case but everything has a beginning.

Notes

  1. alysha-blog-1 reblogged this from donohoe
  2. my-wa-kaul839 reblogged this from donohoe
  3. halo-reach-ranks-a reblogged this from donohoe
  4. wallpaper-script reblogged this from donohoe
  5. nhmortgagebroker reblogged this from dwillis
  6. pisaradotme reblogged this from donohoe
  7. sleepcurrency reblogged this from donohoe
  8. jimray reblogged this from donohoe and added:
    privacy implications...automatically sharing everything you read. It’s nice
  9. sarahsosincere reblogged this from donohoe
  10. jeffcarroll reblogged this from donohoe
  11. sarahmillar reblogged this from donohoe and added:
    Interesting food
  12. hearsayblog reblogged this from donohoe and added:
    Interesting post. Have...checked out http://Hearsay.it? It’s passive sharing
  13. teruterubouzu reblogged this from donohoe and added:
    I’m quite certain my...every news story
  14. sonderman reblogged this from donohoe and added:
    Thanks for sharing this Michael....Poynter.org:...
  15. thisisamysanders reblogged this from teruterubouzu
  16. considr-this reblogged this from donohoe and added:
    the best posts I’ve seen forewarning the new Facebook features. The reason Twitter...place...
  17. dwillis reblogged this from donohoe
  18. harrisj reblogged this from donohoe
  19. kueneman said: we had this same privacy struggle come up in the context of times recommendations - it was simply a no-go to reveal your reads publicly or to your network
  20. donohoe posted this